Philosophy 230
Study questions:  President's Commission, "An Ethical Framework for Access to Health Care" and
                            Daniels, "Equal Opportunity and Health Care"


1.  What is the main conclusion of the President's Commission regarding access to health care?
       How do they defend this conclusion?

2.  What conclusion does Daniels defend regarding access to health care?  How does he defend
       that conclusion?  (In particular, how does equality of opportunity fit into his argument?)

3.  Given these discussions, what potential problems do you see with the President's Commission's
       and Daniel's view of society's obligation to provide health care.  What objections might one
       raise against their views?  How might they respond?