Menu Map

Kevin R. Parker, Ph.D.

Professor of Computer Information Systems
College of Business
Idaho State University
Pocatello, ID
Office: BA 534
Voice: 208.282.4783
Fax: 208.282.4367
Email:

ISU logo
Biography

Kevin Parker is a Professor of Computer Information Systems in the College of Business at Idaho State University. He received a joint appointment to Computer Science in 2010,

He joined the faculty of Idaho State in 1999. From 1995 until 1999 he taught in the Department of Decision Sciences and MIS in the John Cook School of Business at Saint Louis University. He received his Ph.D. in Management Information Systems and M.S. in Computer Science from Texas Tech University and his B.A. from the University of Texas at Austin. From 1985 until 1989 he taught in the Department of Computer Science at New Mexico Junior College, and during the preceding three years worked as a Programmer/Analyst at Conoco, Incorporated.

Kevin is active in the information systems research community. He is former editor for the Journal of Information Technology Education and is on the editorial board for the Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge and Management. He has published several peer-reviewed journal articles, peer-reviewed book chapters, and conference proceedings. His research has appeared in publications such as Communications of the AIS, Journal of Information Systems Education, Journal of Information Technology Education, International Journal of Internet and Enterprise Management, European Journal of Marketing, and Marketing Intelligence and Planning. He has received eight modest research grants. In May of 2006 he received the Idaho State University College of Business 2005-2006 Outstanding Researcher Award.

In March 2011 he was selected as one of the five Master Teachers of 2010-2011 at ISU.

In May of 2003 he received the Idaho State University College of Business 2002-2003 Outstanding Teacher Award, and during the 2004-2005 school year received a perfect 4.00 on teaching effectiveness in four of six classes, and 3.92 in the other two. Kevin has served as a consultant for local industry.

Dr. Parker's Curriculum Vita can be viewed here.

Teaching

Statement of Teaching Philosophy expand topic

  • Conceptualization of Learning

    I believe that students, undergraduates in particular, learn best in a structured environment. Without prior experience with a topic, students often find ambiguity more intimidating than inspiring. Students are more confident when they know where they have been, where they are, and where they are going in a course, because that allows them to see how the subject material fits together into a coherent whole. In a structured environment, students know what is expected of them and can perform accordingly.

    Students also learn better in a relaxed environment. Students must feel free to ask questions without being judged, ridiculed, or intimidated. Furthermore, students should be encouraged to provide feedback on what is, and what is not, working in a class. Most importantly, students should know that their education is a partnership, and that the professor earnestly wants them to learn.

    Students are characterized by various learning styles. Some learn by seeing, some by hearing, and others by doing. A professor must try to incorporate a variety of approaches in his or her lectures and assignments to connect with each type of learner. A professor must bear in mind that their personal learning style will not be optimal for all students.

    I often view teaching IT as providing a student with a set of tools and teaching them how to use them. Because technology evolves so quickly, the professor must focus on concepts rather than specific applications. To continue with the toolkit analogy, if you teach someone how to use a screwdriver they will be able to transfer that knowledge to any screwdriver, whether it is a slotted screwdriver, a Phillips screwdriver, or a Torx screwdriver. Likewise, teaching a student the concepts of sequence, selection, and iteration in a programming class will allow them to apply those concepts to any programming language by making slight changes to the syntax. If the focus is on concepts, however, students must be taught how to find details about the implementation of those concepts when required to use a particular IT tool—in effect, they should be taught how to locate pertinent resources independently and how to comprehend them. Such skills are highly valued by employers. An employee who is self-reliant is preferable to one who requires constant guidance.

  • Conceptualization of Teaching

    When I conceptualize teaching I reflect on the master teachers who have taught me compassion, encouragement, motivation and scholarship. I consider it a blessing to have been taught by so many outstanding educators, and I base my teaching style on their examples. A teacher must care about the students, take the time to learn their names and a little something about them, and be always willing to assist students without doing the work for them. A teacher should know his or her material thoroughly, but also be able to engage the student so as to share a love of learning. A teacher must strive to keep students engaged and engrossed even when the material is dry and technical. And finally, a teacher should be someone that the students can hold in the highest regard and emulate. A teacher is a facilitator, a motivator, and a mentor to those students who have come to them for an education.

  • Goals for Students

    Student goals for every class must be clearly established and provided to the students on the first day of class. When I attended the Georgia State Master Teacher Program they stressed the importance of providing objectives that span the three major learning levels – the Knowledge Level, the Meaningful-Integrated Level, and the Critical Thinking Level.

    My programming courses teach students analytical skills – how to analyze a problem, break it down into its component parts, and devise a solution. Such problem solving skills are critical in the real world. Toward this end, students are required to solve a variety of programming assignments. Those assignments increase in complexity as the semester progresses, in the process expanding and strengthening students’ problem solving and analytical skills.

    Students learn to analyze more complex systems and design a solution in my Analysis and Design and Database courses. The projects cover well over half the semester, and students are required to manage their time accordingly. In order to provide them with a means of managing both the current and future large projects, I teach them to break the project into deliverables, each with a specific task and target date. Further, students perform the projects as part of a team, since industry stresses so highly the ability to interact effectively in a team environment. While it is important that students understand the analysis approaches and modeling techniques that are taught in each class, those approaches change as IT evolves. However, the basic concepts of how to analyze and build a system or database, why it should be modeled and how to go about it, how to manage a large project by scheduling intermediate deliverables, and how to interact with others are critical skills when students enter the workforce.

  • Implementation of the Philosophy

    My classes are highly structured, with course objectives and a lecture schedule clearly spelled out in each syllabus. I prepare extensively for every lecture, thoroughly researching the topic and preparing a set of notes that I post on the web. I make it a point to know every topic thoroughly in spite of the ever-changing nature of IS. I also review journal submissions as well as textbooks in the areas in which I teach in order to stay current with changing technology. When assigning exercises, I carefully write the assignment so that it reflects realistic situations, and then I do the assignment myself in order to be sure that the directions are complete, and to insure that students do not encounter unintended difficulties. Once assignments are submitted, I generally provide a fully documented solution so that students can review the correct solution almost immediately. As noted earlier, my course projects are modularized into intermediate deliverables with individual due dates.

    Even when highly structured, classes can be fun. I enjoy interacting with students and I think that they learn better in a relaxed environment. One of my strengths as a teacher has always been my ability to develop a strong rapport with students. I remember clearly my days as an undergraduate, and I can empathize with students. Students know that I care about them, and they often respond by working harder. I always learn each student’s name as quickly as possible so I can greet them in the halls or know who they are when they ask a question in class. When students miss consecutive class meetings I often send them an e-mail message to check on them. There are no anonymous or unimportant students in my classes.

    Students are encouraged to provide constructive feedback. Students developed the Peer Evaluation form that I use to assess student contributions to the team projects. One former class did not like the form that I developed, so I challenged them to design a new form. Students also helped devise a grading system for the course projects. I always welcome constructive suggestions, and even provide an Anonymous Course Comment form on each class web page for students who prefer not to make suggestions directly. Giving students an opportunity to help shape a course gives them a sense of ownership and empowers and motivates them.

    I also strive to be highly available to students, even outside of office hours. I am almost always available by e-mail, even during the late night hours when students are more likely to working on their homework. My office hours are generally very busy, as both current and former students drop by to visit or ask advice.

    I am a very demanding professor, but I place even higher demands on myself. I received an excellent undergraduate degree in the computing sciences from the University of Texas at Austin, and I see no reason why I should not provide my students with an education of comparable quality. I am passionate about my job. I find it so rewarding when former students write to tell me that they are making a good impression on their employers, and they attribute it to my teaching. To know that you have had a positive impact on even one individual’s life makes all the hard work and preparation worth the effort.

Computer Information Systems (Undergraduate)

  • Interactive Web Development
  • Systems Analysis and Design
  • Database Management Systems
  • Database Design and Implementation
  • Foundations of Computer Programming Using Visual Basic
  • Advanced Business Programming Using Visual Basic
  • Object-Oriented Development Using Java
  • Web Development for eCommerce
  • Special Problems in Computer Information Systems

Graduate Courses

  • Managing Information Technology – Emerging Technologies
  • Systems Analysis and Design
  • Database Management Systems
  • Object-Oriented Programming Techniques
  • Special Problems in Business Administration (MBA)
  • CS/CIS Graduate Technology Seminar
Research Interests

Business Intelligence/Knowledge Management expand topic

  • Park, J., Fables, W., Parker, K.R., & Nitse, P. (2010). The role of culture in business intelligence. International Journal of Business Intelligence Research, 1(3), 1-14.
  • Parker, K.R., Nitse, P.S., and Davey, B. (2008). History of Computing Education Trends: The Emergence of Competitive Intelligence. Impagliazzo, J. (Ed.) IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, Vol. 269 History of Computing and Education 3 (HCE3). Boston: Springer
  • Parker, K.R. & Nitse, P.S. (2006). Competitive Intelligence Gathering. In Schwartz, D.G. (ed.): Encyclopedia of Knowledge Management. Hershey, Pennsylvania: Idea Group Publishing, 44-50.
  • Parker, K.R. & Nitse, P.S. (2005). Improving Competitive Intelligence for Knowledge Management Systems. International Journal of Internet and Enterprise Management (IJIEM) (Special Issue on Business Intelligence for Competitive Advantages), 3 (1), 24-45.
  • Nitse, P.S. & Parker, K.R. (2005). Integrating Knowledge Management and Competitive Intelligence into both the Retailing and Services Businesses. Proceedings of the 12th International EIRASS Conference on Recent Advances in Retailing and Services Science, Orlando, Florida: July 21-24.
  • Nitse, P.S. & Parker, K.R. (2003). Library Science, Knowledge Management, Competitive Intelligence: Archive Theory the Common Link. The Reference Librarian, 38 (79/80), 395-407.
  • Nitse, P.S., Parker, K.R., & Dishman, P.L. (2003). Multi-class Interest Profile Applications in the Intelligence Process. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 21 (5), 263-271.
  • Saxby, C.L., Parker, K.R., Nitse, P.S., & Dishman, P.L. (2002). Environmental Scanning and Organizational Culture. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 20 (1), 28-34.
  • Parker, K.R. & Nitse, P.S. (2001). Improving Competitive Intelligence Gathering for Knowledge Management Systems. Proceedings of The 2001 International Symposium on Information Systems and Engineering (ISE'2001-Workshop: Knowledge Management Systems: Concepts, Technologies and Applications), Las Vegas, Nevada: June 25-28 (pp. 122-128).
  • Parker, K.R. & Nitse, P.S. (2000). A Multi-Class Interest Profile (M-CLIP) For Online Competitive Intelligence Systems. Proceedings of the Society of Competitive Intelligence Professionals (SCIP) Academic Conference on Competitive Intelligence: Curriculum and Research, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: December 8.

Semantic Web expand topic

  • Parker, K.R., Williams, R.F, Nitse, P.S., & Tay, A. (2008). Use of the Normalized Word Vector Approach in Document Classification for an LKMC. Journal of Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 5, 523-524. Link
  • Parker, K.R., & Nitse, P.S. (2007). Bilgi Yönetim Merkezleri Olarak Kütüphaneler. (C. Aydýn, Trans.). Journal of Turkish Librarianship, 21 (1), 88-103.
  • Parker, K.R. (2006). Enabling Technologies for the Semantic Web. In Lytras, Miltiadis D. & Naeve, Ambjorn (Eds): Intelligent Learning Infrastructures for Knowledge Intensive Organizations: A Semantic Web Perspective. Hershey, Pennsylvania: Idea Group Publishing, 39-56.
  • Parker, K.R., Nitse, P.S., & Flowers K.A. (2005). Libraries as Knowledge Management Centers. Library Management Journal (Special Issue on Digital Libraries in the Knowledge Era: Knowledge Management and Semantic Web Technology), 26 (4/5), 176-189.
  • Nitse, P.S. & Parker, K.R. (2005). Gathering Information in the Digital Age Using the Semantic Web. In Frontiers of e-Business Research, Tampere, Finland: September 26-28.

Color Inaccuracies in eCommerce expand topic

  • Parker, K.R., Nitse, P.S., & Tay, A. (2009). The Impact of Inaccurate Color on Customer Retention and CRM. Informing Science: the International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 12, 105-112.
  • Nitse, P.S., Parker, K.R., Ottaway, T.A., & Krumwiede, D.W. (2004). The Impact of Color in the E-commerce Marketing of Fashions: An Exploratory Study. European Journal of Marketing, 38 (7/8), 898-915.
  • Nitse, P.S. & Parker, K.R. (2004). Consumer Perception of Color Depicted on E-Commerce Websites: An Exploratory Study. Proceedings of the 11th International EIRASS Conference on Recent Advances in Retailing and Services Science, Prague, Czechoslovakia, July 10-13.
  • Krumwiede, D., Parker, K.R., Nitse, P.S., & Ottaway, T.A. (2004). Customer Sensitivity to Electronically Reproduced Color Products: Its effect on the Operation of Return Goods. Distribution Business Management Association Annual Conference Proceedings, Chicago, Illinois, May 18-20 (pp. 1-9).
  • Parker, K.R. & Nitse, P.S. (2004). The Impact of Color Inaccuracies on E-Commerce Sites. Proceedings of the Information Technology & Global Business Research Conference, Cancun, Mexico, March 10-13 (pp. 50-56).
  • Krumwiede, D., Nitse, P.S., Parker, K.R., & Ottaway, T.A. (2003). Returning Internet Purchased Color Sensitive Products: The Effect on the Supply Chain. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of the Decision Sciences Institute, Shanghai,China: July 4-8.
  • Nitse, P.S., Parker, K.R., Ottaway, T.A., & Krumwiede, D.W. (2002). The Impact of Consumer Perception on E-Commerce Transactions." Proceedings of The International Applied Business Research Conference, Puerto Vallarta, Mexico: March 14-19.

Information Assurance in Analysis & Design expand topic

  • Trimmer, K., Parker, K.R., & Schou, C. (2009). Functional requirements for secure code: The reference monitor and use case. Academy of Information and Management Sciences Journal, 12 (2), 113-119.
  • Trimmer, K., Parker, K. R., & Schou, C. (2008). Functional Requirements: The Reference Monitor and Use Case. Proceedings of the Academy of Information and Management Sciences, Reno, Nevada: October 15-17 (p. 264).
  • Trimmer, K., Parker, K.R., & Schou, C. (2007). Forcing Early Implementation of Information Assurance Precepts throughout the Design Phase. Journal of Informatics Education Research, 9 (1), 95-120.
  • Schou, C., Trimmer, K., & Parker, K.R. (2005). Forcing Early Binding of Security Using a Design Reference Monitor Concept in Systems Analysis and Design Courses. Proceedings of the International Conference on Informatics Education and Research, Las Vegas, Nevada: December 9-11 (pp. 321-331).

Programming & Programming Languages expand topic

  • Parker, K.R. (2010). The reference list formatter: An object-oriented development project. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 5, 23-48.
  • Davey, B. & Parker, K.R. (2006). Language History - A Tale of Two Countries. In Impagliazzo, J. (Ed.) IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, Vol. 215 History of Computing and Education 2 (HCE2). Boston: Springer, 139-151.
  • Parker, K.R., Chao, J.T., Ottaway, T.A., & Chang, J. (2006). A Formal Programming Language Selection Process for Introductory Courses. Journal of Information Technology Education, 5, 133-151
  • Parker, K.R., Ottaway, T.O., & Chao, J.C. (2006). Criteria for the Selection of a Programming Language for Introductory Courses. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 2 (1/2), 119-139.
  • Ottaway, T.A., Parker, K.R., & Chao, J.T. (2006). The Selection of A Language for Introductory Programming Courses: An Exploratory Survey. Proceedings of the Western Decision Sciences Institute, Waikoloa, Hawaii, April 11-15 (pp. 270-272).

IT-Enhanced Learning expand topic

  • Davey, B. & Parker, K.R. (2010). Turning points in computer education. In Tatnall, A. (Ed.) IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, Vol. 325 History of Computing: Learning from the Past. Boston: Springer, 159-168.
  • Parker, K.R. (2010). Selecting Software Tools for IS/IT Curricula. Education and Information Technologies (Special Issue on Information Systems Curriculum), 15(4), 255-275.
  • Davey, B. & Parker, K.R. (2010). Technology in education: An agile systems approach. Proceedings of 2010 Informing Science + Information Technology Education (InSITE) Conference, Cassino, Italy, June 21-24 (pp. 297-306).
  • Chin, K.L., Chang, E., Atkinson, D., & Parker, K.R. (2007). Ontology-based IT Pedagogical Knowledge Framework. Proceedings of the 2007 Computer Science and Information Technology Education Conference, Mauritius, November 16-18 (155-166).
  • Beachboard, J.C. & Parker, K.R. (2005). Understanding Information Technology: What do Graduates from Business-oriented IS Curricula Need to Know? Journal of Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 2, 219-236.
  • Parker, K.R. (2002). Using and Enhancing Online Lecture Materials. Mountain Plains Journal of Business and Economics, 3.
  • Beachboard, J.C. & Parker, K.R. (2003). How Much is Enough? Teaching Information Technology in a Business-Oriented IS Curriculum. Proceedings of the 2003 Americas Conference on Information Systems, Tampa, FL: August 4-6, 3026-3031.
  • Bezik, M.H., Smith, K., & Parker, K.R. (2005). SPUD's – A Computer-assisted Interactive Project for use in Intermediate Accounting Courses. 2005 Western Region American Accounting Association Meeting, Sacramento, CA: April 29-30.
  • Parker, K.R. (2001). Techniques to Enhance Online Lecture Materials. Proceedings of the 2001 Mountain Plains Management Conference, Pocatello, Idaho: October 17-19.
  • Aytes, K. & Parker, K.R. (2001). Using the Web to Create a Dynamic, Interactive Learning Environment. Proceedings of the 2001 Mountain Plains Management Conference, Pocatello, Idaho: October 17-19.

Wikis in Education expand topic

  • Parker, K.R. & Chao, J. (2008). Weaving a Knowledge Web with Wikis. In Lytras M.D, Tennyson R.D., Ordóñez de Pablos, P. (eds): Knowledge Networks: The Social Software Perspective. Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGI Global Publishing.
  • Parker, K.R. & Chao, J. (2007). Wiki as a Teaching Tool. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3, 57-72.

Database Development & Education expand topic

  • Parker, K.R., Davis, T., & Ward, D.M. (2007). Herbicide Damage Tracking System: An IS Case Study. Proceedings of the North American Case Research Association, 21 (10), Keystone, Colorado, October 18-20 (58).
  • Parker, K.R. (2005). Lost River Wind Riders: A Project for Teaching Database Design. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16 (24), 475-494.
  • Parker, K.R. (2004). A Data Model Validation Approach for Relational Database Design Courses. Journal of Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 1, 813-825.
  • Parker, K.R. (2003). A Database Design Case: Teton Whitewater Kayak. Journal of Information Systems Education (Special Issue on IS Teaching Cases), 14 (3), 271-274.

Resources-Events-Agents Model expand topic

  • Parker, K.R., LeRouge, C., & Trimmer, K. (2005). Alternative Instructional Strategies in an IS Curriculum. Journal of Information Technology Education, 4, 43-60.
  • Parker, K. R., Trimmer, K., & LeRouge, C. (2005). The REA Ontology to Supplement Teaching Data Flow Diagrams. Proceedings of the 2005 Americas Conference on Information Systems: Ontological Analysis in Systems Analysis and Design Track, Omaha, NE: August 11-14.
  • Parker, K. R., Trimmer, K., & LeRouge, C. (2005). The Correspondence between the REA Ontology and Data Flow Diagrams." 2005 Western Region American Accounting Association Meeting, Sacramento, CA: April 29-30.
  • Trimmer, K. & Parker, K.R. (2004). Revising Instructional Strategies in Systems Analysis and Design. Proceedings of the 2004 International Conference on Informatics Education Research, Washington, DC, December 10-12.

Miscellaneous expand topic

  • Trimmer, K., Parker, K. , & Creelman, J. (2006). Lessons Learned in a Collaborative Development Project–Documentation For Physical Therapy Education. Proceedings of the International Conference on Informatics Education and Research, Milwaukee, WI: December 8-9 (320-336).
  • Ottaway, T.A. & Parker, K.R. (2002). A Conceptual Model of Structural Adaptation in Agent-based Workflow Management Systems. Proceedings of the 2002 Americas Conference on Information Systems, Dallas, Texas: August 9-11, 1476-1483.
  • LeBlanc, R. & Parker, K.R. (2001). A Customer-Based Framework for Understanding e-Commerce Relationships. Proceedings of the International Business & Economics Research Conference 2001, Reno, Nevada: October 8-12.  Received Best Paper Award.
Service

Professional

  • Former editor of Journal of Information Technology Education.
  • Member of the Editorial Board of the Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge and Management.
  • Information Technology Management Track Chair for the North American Case Research Association (NACRA) 2007 Annual Meeting.
  • International-Linkage Member of Curtin University of Technology's Tier 1 University Research Centre - Digital Ecosystems and Business Intelligence (DEBII).
  • Reviewer for IEEE’s Transactions on Software Engineering, International Journal of Internet and Enterprise Management, Electronic Commerce Research Journal, International Journal of Electronic Commerce and Business Media, Communications of the ACM, Electronic Markets, and Mountain Plains Journal.
  • Reviewed papers for the AMCIS 2002 Intelligent Agents Track, the AMCIS 2003 Education Track, ICIS 2001, the 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007 Informing Science + IT Education Joint Conferences, and the 2006, 2007, and 2008 Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science (HICSS).
  • Reviewed texts for D.C.Heath and Company, West Publishing Company, McGraw-Hill, Course Technology, Addison-Wesley, Prentice-Hall, and Wiley.
  • Served as an external peer reviewer for the Purdue University College of Technology Promotion Committee.
  • Served as an outside evaluator for the University of New Mexico-Gallup Rank and Tenure Committee.
  • Served as an external peer reviewer for the University of Nevada, Reno College of Business Administration Promotion and Tenure Committee.
  • Served as external referee for 2007 Curtin University of Technology Promotion Committee.

University

  • Member of Campus Safety Committee
  • Chair of Athletic Recruiting Liasson Committee
  • Former chair and current member of the Faculty Support Committee
  • Former member of Athletic Advisory Board
  • Former member of the Campus Planning Council
  • Coordinator for United Way for ISU College of Business (2000-2007)
  • Saint Louis University, Faculty Advisory for MIS Club
Website

Kevin Parker's website can be accessed via this link.

His Curriculum Vita can be viewed here.