|
|
| Biography |
|
Kevin Parker is a Professor of Computer Information
Systems in the College of Business at Idaho State University.
He joined the faculty of Idaho State in 1999. From
1995 until 1999 he taught in the Department
of Decision Sciences and MIS in the John Cook School
of Business at Saint Louis
University. He received his Ph.D. in Management
Information Systems and M.S. in Computer Science from Texas Tech University and his
B.A. from the University of
Texas at Austin. From 1985 until 1989 he taught in the
Department of Computer Science at New Mexico Junior College, and
during the preceding three years worked as a
Programmer/Analyst at Conoco,
Incorporated.
Kevin is active in the information systems research
community. He is an editor for the Journal of Information Technology
Education and is on the editorial board for the Interdisciplinary Journal of
Information, Knowledge and Management. He has
published several peer-reviewed journal articles, peer-reviewed book chapters, and conference
proceedings. His research has appeared in publications such as
Communications of the AIS, Journal of Information Systems
Education, Journal of Information Technology Education,
International Journal of Internet and Enterprise Management,
European Journal of Marketing, and Marketing
Intelligence and Planning. He has received eight modest
research grants. In May of 2006 he received the Idaho State
University College of Business 2005-2006 Outstanding Researcher
Award.
In May of 2003 he received the Idaho State
University College of Business 2002-2003 Outstanding Teacher
Award, and during the 2004-2005 school year received a perfect
4.00 on teaching effectiveness in four of six classes, and
3.92 in the other two. Kevin has served as a consultant for
local industry.
Dr. Parker's Curriculum Vita
can be viewed here.
|
| Teaching |
Statement of Teaching Philosophy
- Conceptualization of Learning
I believe that
students, undergraduates in particular, learn best in a
structured environment. Without prior experience with a
topic, students often find ambiguity more intimidating
than inspiring. Students are more confident when they know
where they have been, where they are, and where they are
going in a course, because that allows them to see how the
subject material fits together into a coherent whole. In a
structured environment, students know what is expected of
them and can perform accordingly.
Students also learn better in a
relaxed environment. Structured or not, the classroom
environment should not be too rigid. Students must feel
free to ask questions without being judged, ridiculed, or
intimidated. Furthermore, students should be encouraged to
provide feedback on what is, and what is not, working in a
class. Most importantly, students should know that their
education is a partnership, and that the professor
earnestly wants them to learn.
Students are characterized by various
learning styles. Some learn by seeing, some by hearing,
and others by doing. A professor must try to incorporate a
variety of approaches in his or her lectures and
assignments to connect with each type of learner. A
professor must bear in mind that their personal learning
style will not be optimal for all students.
I often view teaching IT as providing
a student with a set of tools and teaching them how to use
them. Because technology evolves so quickly, the professor
must focus on concepts rather than specific applications.
Teaching a student the concepts of
sequence, selection, and iteration in a programming class
will allow them to apply those concepts to any programming
language by making slight changes to the syntax. If the
focus is on applications, however, students must be taught how
to find details about the implementation of those concepts
when required to use a particular IT tool. In effect,
students
should be taught how to locate pertinent resources
independently and how to comprehend them. Such skills are
highly valued by employers. An employee who is a
self-starter is preferable to one who requires constant
guidance.
- Conceptualization of Teaching
When I first started teaching, a
veteran professor told me that teaching is 10% education
and 90% entertainment. He explained that education is not
possible unless you are able to get and keep a student’s
attention. When I conceptualize teaching I reflect on the
master teachers who have molded my education.
From them I learned how to be caring and compassionate,
how to motivate and encourage students, and how to share
knowledge in a captivating way through colorful presentations. I
consider it a blessing to have been taught by so many
outstanding educators, and I base my teaching style on
their examples. A teacher must care about the students,
take the time to learn their names and a little something
about them, and be always willing to assist students
without doing the work for them. A teacher should know his
or her material thoroughly, but also be able to engage the
student so as to share a love of learning. A teacher must
strive to keep students engaged and engrossed even when
the material is dry and technical. And finally, a teacher
should be someone that the students can hold in the
highest regard and emulate. A teacher is a facilitator, a
motivator, and a mentor to those students who have come to
them for an education.
- Goals for Students
Student goals for
every class must be clearly established and provided to
the students on the first day of class. When I attended
the Georgia State Master Teacher Program they stressed the
importance of providing objectives that span the three
major learning levels – the Knowledge Level, the
Meaningful-Integrated Level, and the Critical Thinking
Level.
My programming courses teach students
analytical skills—how to analyze a problem, break it down
into its component parts, and devise a solution. Such
problem solving skills are critical in the real world.
Toward this end, students are required to solve a variety
of programming assignments. Those assignments increase in
complexity as the semester progresses, in the process
expanding and strengthening students’ problem solving and
analytical skills.
Students learn to analyze more
complex systems and design a solution in my Analysis and
Design and Database courses. The projects cover well over
half the semester. In order to provide students with a
means of managing both the current and future large
projects, I teach them to break the project into
deliverables, each with a specific task and target date.
Further, students perform the projects as part of a team,
since industry stresses so highly the ability to interact
effectively in a team environment. While it is important
that students understand the analysis approaches and
modeling techniques that are taught in each class, those
approaches change as IT evolves. However, the basic
concepts of how to analyze and build a system or database,
why it should be modeled and how to go about it, how to
manage a large project by scheduling intermediate
deliverables, and how to interact with others are critical
skills when students enter the workforce.
-
Implementation of the Philosophy
All of my classes
are highly structured, with course objectives and a
lecture schedule clearly spelled out in each syllabus. I
prepare extensively for every lecture, thoroughly
researching the topic and preparing a set of notes that I
post on the web. I make it a point to know every topic
thoroughly in spite of the ever-changing nature of IS. I
also review journal submissions as well as textbooks in
the areas in which I teach in order to stay current with
changing technology. When assigning exercises, I carefully
write the assignment so that it reflects realistic
situations, and then I do the assignment myself in order
to be sure that the directions are complete, and to insure
that students do not encounter unintended difficulties.
As noted earlier, my
course projects are also structured, modularized into
intermediate deliverables with individual due dates.
Even when highly structured, classes
can be fun. I enjoy interacting with students and I think
that they learn better in a relaxed environment. One of my
strengths as a teacher has always been my ability to
develop a strong rapport with students. I remember clearly
my days as an undergraduate, and I can empathize with
students. Students know that I care about them, and they
often respond by working harder. I always learn each
student’s name as quickly as possible so I can greet them
in the halls or know who they are when they ask a question
in class. When students miss consecutive class meetings I
often send them an e-mail message to check on them. There
are no anonymous or unimportant students in my
classes.
Students are encouraged to provide
constructive feedback. Students developed the Peer
Evaluation form that I use to assess student contributions
to the team projects. One former class did not like the
form that I developed, so I challenged them to design the
new form. Students also helped devise a grading system for
the course projects. Feedback must be provided on
intermediate deliverables, but students seldom do well
because of a lack of experience. Students suggested a
weighted scheme in which deliverables are grades, but
count only a third of the overall project grade. I always
welcome constructive suggestions, and even provide an
Anonymous Course Comment form on each class web page for
students who prefer not to make suggestions directly.
Giving students an opportunity to help shape a course
gives them a sense of ownership and empowers and motivates
them.
I also strive to be highly available
to students, even outside of office hours. I am almost
always available by e-mail, even during the late night
hours when students are more likely to working on their
homework. My office hours are generally very busy, as both
current and former students drop by to visit or ask
advice.
I am a very demanding professor, but
I place even higher demands on myself. I received an
excellent undergraduate degree in the computing sciences
from the University of Texas at Austin, and I see no
reason why I should not provide my students with an
education of comparable quality. I am passionate about my
job. I find it so rewarding when former students write to
tell me that they are making a good impression on their
employers, and they attribute it to my teaching. To know
that you have had a positive impact on even one
individual’s life makes all the hard work and preparation
worth the
effort.
Computer Information Systems (Undergraduate)
- Systems
Analysis and Design
- Database
Management Systems
- Database
Design and Implementation
- Foundations
of Computer Programming Using Visual Basic
- Advanced
Business Programming Using Visual Basic
- Object-Oriented Development Using Java
- Web
Development for eCommerce
- Special
Problems in Computer Information Systems
MBA Program
- Managing
Information Technology--Emerging Technologies
- Systems
Analysis and Design
- Database
Management Systems
- Object-Oriented Programming Techniques
-
Special Problems in Business Administration (MBA)
- CS/CIS
Graduate Technology Seminar
|
| Research Interests |
Semantic Web
-
Parker,
K.R., Nitse, P.S. (2007). "Bilgi Yönetim Merkezleri Olarak Kütüphaneler." (C.
Aydýn, Trans.). Journal of Turkish Librarianship, 21 (1), 88-103.
- Parker, K.R. (2006).
"Enabling Technologies for the Semantic Web." In
Lytras, Miltiadis D. & Naeve,
Ambjorn (Eds): Intelligent Learning Infrastructures for
Knowledge Intensive Organizations: A Semantic Web
Perspective. Hershey, Pennsylvania: Idea Group
Publishing, 39-56.
- Parker, K.R., Nitse, P.S., & Flowers K.A.
(2005). "Libraries as Knowledge Management Centers."
Library Management Journal -- Special Issue on Digital
Libraries in the Knowledge Era: Knowledge Management and
Semantic Web Technology, 26 (4/5),
176-189.
- Nitse, P.S. & Parker, K.R.
(2005). "Gathering Information in the Digital Age
Using the Semantic Web." In Frontiers of e-Business
Research, Tampere, Finland: September
26-28.
Competitive Intelligence/Knowledge
Management
- Parker,
K.R. & Nitse, P.S. (2006). "Competitive Intelligence
Gathering." In Schwartz, D.G. (ed.):
Encyclopedia of Knowledge Management. Hershey,
Pennsylvania: Idea Group Publishing, 44-50.
- Parker, K.R. &
Nitse, P.S. (2005). "Improving Competitive Intelligence for
Knowledge Management Systems." International Journal of
Internet and Enterprise Management (IJIEM) -- Special Issue
on Business Intelligence for Competitive Advantages, 3
(1), 24-45.
- Nitse,
P.S. & Parker, K.R. (2005). "Integrating Knowledge
Management and Competitive Intelligence into both the
Retailing and Services Businesses." In Proceedings of the
12th International EIRASS Conference on Recent Advances in
Retailing and Services Science, Orlando,
Florida: July 21-24.
- Nitse,
P.S. & Parker, K.R. (2003). "Library Science, Knowledge
Management, Competitive Intelligence: Archive Theory the
Common Link." The Reference Librarian, 38 (79/80),
395-407.
- Nitse,
P.S., Parker, K.R., & Dishman, P.L. (2003). "Multi-class
Interest Profile Applications in the Intelligence Process."
Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 21 (5),
263-271.
- Saxby,
C.L., Parker, K.R., Nitse, P.S., & Dishman, P.L. (2002).
"Environmental Scanning and Organizational
Culture." Marketing Intelligence and Planning,
20 (1), 28-34.
- Parker,
K.R. & Nitse, P.S. (2001). “Improving Competitive
Intelligence Gathering for Knowledge Management Systems.” In
Proceedings of The 2001 International Symposium on
Information Systems and Engineering (ISE'2001-Workshop:
Knowledge Management Systems: Concepts, Technologies and
Applications), Las Vegas, Nevada: June 25-28 (pp.
122-128).
- Parker,
K.R. & Nitse, P.S. (2000), “A Multi-Class Interest
Profile (M-CLIP) For Online Competitive Intelligence
Systems.” In Proceedings of the Society of Competitive
Intelligence Professionals (SCIP) Academic Conference on
Competitive Intelligence: Curriculum and Research,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: December 8.
E-Commerce Color Inaccuracy
- Nitse, P.S., Parker, K.R., Ottaway,
T.A., & Krumwiede, D.W. (2004). "The Impact of Color in
the E-commerce Marketing of Fashions: An Exploratory Study."
European Journal of Marketing, 38 (7/8),
898-915.
- Nitse, P.S. & Parker, K.R. (2004).
"Consumer Perception of Color Depicted on E-Commerce
Websites: An Exploratory Study." In Proceedings of the
11th International EIRASS Conference on Recent Advances in
Retailing and Services Science, Prague,
Czechoslovakia, July 10-13.
- Krumwiede, D., Parker, K.R., Nitse,
P.S., & Ottaway, T.A. (2004). "Customer Sensitivity to
Electronically Reproduced Color Products: Its effect on the
Operation of Return Goods." In Distribution
Business Management Association Annual Conference
Proceedings, Chicago, Illinois, May 18-20 (pp.
1-9).
- Parker, K.R. & Nitse, P.S. (2004).
"The Impact of Color Inaccuracies on E-Commerce Sites." In
Proceedings of the Information Technology & Global
Business Research Conference, Cancun, Mexico, March
10-13 (pp. 50-56).
- Krumwiede, D., Nitse, P.S., Parker,
K.R., & Ottaway, T.A. (2003). "Returning Internet
Purchased Color Sensitive Products: The Effect On The
Supply Chain." In Proceedings of the 7th International
Conference of the Decision Sciences Institute, Shanghai,
China: July 4-8.
- Nitse, P.S., Parker, K.R., Ottaway,
T.A., & Krumwiede, D.W. (2002). "The Impact of Consumer
Perception on E-Commerce Transactions." In
Proceedings of The International Applied Business
Research Conference, Puerto Vallarta, Mexico: March
14-19.
Information Assurance
- Trimmer,
K., Parker, K.R., & Schou, C. (2007). “Forcing Early Implementation of
Information Assurance Precepts throughout the Design Phase.” Journal of
Informatics Education Research, 9 (1), 95-120.
- Schou, C., Trimmer, K., & Parker, K.R. (2005). "Forcing Early Binding of Security Using a Design
Reference Monitor Concept in Systems Analysis and Design
Courses." In Proceedings of the
International Conference on Informatics Education and
Research, Las Vegas, Nevada: December 9-11
(pp. 321-331).
Pedagogy–Database
-
Parker, K.R., Davis, T., & Ward, D.M. (2007). "Herbicide Damage
Tracking System: An IS Case Study." In Proceedings of the North American Case
Research Association, 21 (10), Keystone, Colorado, October 18-20 (58).
- Parker, K.R. (2005). "Lost River Wind
Riders: A Project for Teaching Database Design."
Communications of the Association for Information
Systems, 16 (24), 475-494.
- Parker, K.R. (2004). "A Data Model
Validation Approach for Relational Database Design Courses."
Journal of Issues in Informing Science and Information
Technology, 1, 813-825.
- Parker, K.R. (2003). "A Database Design
Case: Teton Whitewater Kayak." Journal of Information
Systems Education -- Special Issue on IS Teaching Cases,
14 (3), 271-274.
Pedagogy–REA
- Parker, K.R., LeRouge, C., &
Trimmer, K. (2005). "Alternative Instructional Strategies in
an IS Curriculum." Journal of Information Technology
Education, 4, 43-60.
- Parker, K. R., Trimmer, K., &
LeRouge, C. (2005). "The REA Ontology as an Alternative to
Data Flow Diagrams." In Proceedings of the 2005 Americas
Conference on Information Systems: Ontological Analysis in
Systems Analysis and Design Track, Omaha, NE: August
11-14.
- Parker, K. R., Trimmer, K., &
LeRouge, C. (2005) "The Correspondence between the REA
Ontology and Data Flow Diagrams." 2005 Western Region
American Accounting Association Meeting, Sacramento, CA:
April 29-30.
- Trimmer, K. & Parker, K.R. (2004).
"Revising Instructional Strategies in Systems Analysis and
Design." In Proceedings of the 2004 International
Conference on Informatics Education Research,
Washington, DC, December 10-12.
Pedagogy–Programming Languages
-
Davey, B.
& Parker, K.R. (2006). "Language History - A Tale of Two
Countries." Impagliazzo, J. (Ed.) IFIP International Federation for
Information Processing, Vol. 215 History of Computing and Education 2 (HCE2).
Boston: Springer, 139-151.
- Parker, K.R.,
Chao, J.T., Ottaway, T.A., & Chang, J. (2006). "A Formal
Programming Language Selection Process for Introductory
Courses." Journal of Information Technology Education,
(5), 133-151
- Parker, K.R.,
Ottaway, T.O., & Chao, J.C. (2006). "Criteria for the
Selection of a Programming Language for Introductory
Courses." International Journal of
Knowledge and Learning, 2 (1/2), 119-139.
- Ottaway, T.A.,
Parker, K.R., & Chao, J.T. (2006). "The Selection of A
Language for Introductory Programming Courses: An
Exploratory Survey." Proceedings of the
Western Decision Sciences Institute, Waikoloa, Hawaii,
April 11-15 (pp. 270-272).
Pedagogy–IT-Enhanced Learning
-
Chin, K.L., Chang, E., Atkinson, D.,
& Parker, K.R. (2007). "Ontology-based IT Pedagogical Knowledge Framework."
Proceedings of the 2007 Computer Science and Information Technology Education
Conference, Mauritius, November 16-18 (155-166).
- Beachboard, J.C. & Parker, K.R.
(2005). "Understanding Information
Technology: What do Graduates from Business-oriented IS
Curricula Need to Know?" Journal of
Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology,
2, 219-236.
- Parker, K.R. (2002). "Using and
Enhancing Online Lecture Materials." Mountain Plains Journal
of Business and Economics, 3.
- Beachboard, J.C. & Parker, K.R.
(2003). "How Much is Enough? Teaching Information
Technology in a Business-Oriented IS Curriculum." In
Proceedings of the 2003 Americas Conference on
Information Systems, Tampa, FL: August 4-6 (pp.
3026-3031).
- Bezik, M.H., Smith, K., & Parker,
K.R. (2005). "SPUD's - A Computer-assisted Interactive
Project for use in Intermediate Accounting Courses." 2005
Western Region American Accounting Association Meeting,
Sacramento, CA: April 29-30.
- Parker, K.R. (2001). "Techniques to
Enhance Online Lecture Materials." In Proceedings of the
2001 Mountain Plains Management Conference,
Pocatello, Idaho: October 17-19.
- Aytes, K. & Parker, K.R. (2001).
"Using the Web to Create a Dynamic, Interactive Learning
Environment." In Proceedings of the 2001 Mountain Plains
Management Conference, Pocatello, Idaho: October
17-19.
Miscellaneous
-
Parker, K.R. & Chao, J. (2007). "Wiki as a Teaching
Tool." International Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, (3),
57-72.
-
Trimmer,
K., Parker, K. , & Creelman, J. (2006) "Lessons Learned in a Collaborative
Development Project–Documentation For Physical Therapy Education." In
Proceedings of the International Conference on Informatics Education and
Research, Milwaukee, WI: December 8-9 (320-336).
- Ottaway, T.A. & Parker, K.R.
(2002). "A Conceptual Model of Structural Adaptation in
Agent-based Workflow Management Systems." In
Proceedings of the 2002 Americas Conference on
Information Systems, Dallas, Texas: August 9-11 (pp.
1476-1483).
- LeBlanc, R. & Parker, K.R. (2001).
"A Customer-Based Framework for Understanding e-Commerce
Relationships." In Proceedings of the International
Business & Economics Research Conference 2001, Reno,
Nevada: October 8-12. Received Best Paper
Award.
|
| Service |
|
Professional
- Editor of
Journal of Information Technology Education.
- Member of the
Editorial Board of the Interdisciplinary Journal of
Information, Knowledge and Management.
- Information
Technology Management Track Chair for the North American
Case Research Association (NACRA) 2007 Annual Meeting.
-
International-Linkage Member of Curtin University of
Technology's Tier 1 University Research Centre - Digital
Ecosystems and Business Intelligence (DEBII).
- Reviewer for
IEEE’s Transactions on Software
Engineering, International
Journal of Internet and Enterprise Management,
Electronic Commerce Research Journal, International
Journal of Electronic Commerce and Business Media,
Communications of the ACM, Electronic Markets,
and Mountain Plains Journal.
- Reviewed papers for
the AMCIS 2002 Intelligent Agents Track, the AMCIS 2003
Education Track, ICIS 2001, the 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007
Informing Science + IT Education Joint Conferences, and the
2006, 2007, and 2008 Hawaii International Conference on
Systems Science (HICSS).
- Reviewed texts for
D.C.Heath and Company, West Publishing Company, McGraw-Hill,
Course Technology, Addison-Wesley, Prentice-Hall, and Wiley.
- Served as an external peer reviewer
for the Purdue University College of Technology Promotion
Committee.
- Served as an outside evaluator for
the University of New Mexico-Gallup Rank and Tenure
Committee.
- Served as an external peer reviewer
for the University of Nevada, Reno College of Business
Administration Promotion and Tenure Committee.
- Served as external referee for 2007
Curtin University of Technology Promotion Committee.
University
- Chair of
Student Recruitment Committee
- Chair of the
Faculty Support Committee
- Member of
Athletic Advisory Board
- Member of the
Campus Planning Council
- Coordinator for
United Way for ISU College of Business (2000-2007)
- Saint Louis
University, Faculty Advisory for MIS Club
|
|