You may return to the RELIGIOUS REFORMATION AND CONFLICT HOME PAGE.

Religious Reformation and Conflict: Second Examination

Your examination essays must be sent to my e-mail address [owenjack@fs.isu.edu] by 3:00 p.m. on Tuesday, 1 April 1997.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

The abilities to follow instructions and finish on time are parts of this examination. Be sure to organize and type your essays in either ASCII (plain text) or WordPerfect 5.1 or lower. You may use other sources, but what you write MUST START FROM AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE ASSIGNED READING. Make sure to cite the sources of any words, information, and ideas which are not your own (including those of other students). You MUST follow the instructions for the use of notes and for the form of notes and the bibliography of cited works that are described in the pages on PLAGIARISM and BIBLIOGRAPHY AND CITATION STYLE.

WRITE ON BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING:

FIRST ESSAY ASSIGNMENT

In her book Ambivalent Conquests, Inga Clendinnen discusses a number of conflicts involving Castilian settlers, Franciscan missionaries, and the Maya. You are to write an essay in which you do the following: 1) explain what these conflicts were; 2) using the theoretical approach of Jeffrey C. Alexander, explain why these conflicts took place. Where possible, make use of comparative cases drawn from Robert Markus' The End of Ancient Christianity, from Michael G. Baylor's edition of political tracts from the Radical Reformation, and from your own research for the class project.

SECOND ESSAY ASSIGNMENT

Using the documents in Michael G. Baylor (ed.), The Radical Reformation, write an essay in which you evaluate the Project Hypothesis. Both these documents and Baylor's introductory chapter and supporting material provide a great deal of information about the social and cultural environments of human action in German-speaking lands in the mid-1520s. For your evaluation of the hypothesis, make sure that you employ the full range of Jeffrey C. Alexander's analytical approach, on the which the hypothesis is based.


All contents copyright (C) 1997.
J. B. Owens
All rights reserved.

Revised: 27 March 1997

URL: http://www.isu.edu/~owenjack/rrc/sexam.html