PEER Editorial Board

Morris Coats
Nicholls State University
 Don Coffin
Indiana University Northwest
Greg Delemeester
Marietta College

 Cynthia Hill
Idaho State University
Joe Kerkvliet
Oregon State University
The Wilderness Society
 Kathryn Nantz
Fairfield University
Cliff Nowell
Weber State University
 Tesa Stegner
Idaho State University
Dirk Yandell
University of San Diego

Reviewer Responsibilities

Role and Responsibilities of Reviewers

Manuscript reviewers are asked to judge submissions in light of the following questions:
  1. Does the paper contribute to the literature, present new ideas, or pose a new or interesting issue related to economic education? Is the review of relevant literature sufficient to support that the work is a contribution to the literature?
  2. Are the research or methodological techniques used in the paper appropriate, and are proper inferences made from the results?
  3. Is the paper well organized, written, and presented?
  4. Is the paper appropriate for and would it be of interest to the Perspectives on Economic Education Research audience?
 

Please note: You appear to be using a browser that does not support current web standards. Even though this site will still be functional, it may not appear as intended. To upgrade your browser, go to www.mozilla.org or www.netscape.com.